Product cybersecurity
needed a common thread.
There is no shortage of tools. Teams can scan vulnerabilities, produce SBOMs, model threats, document risks and generate reports. Yet as the product evolves, this information often becomes separated from the context that originally connected it.
An industrial or connected product cannot be reduced to a CVE, a TARA or an SBOM.
Real product security comes from the interaction between composition, architecture, use, vulnerabilities, relevant threats, risk and the decisions made by teams. This broader view guided the design of VAST.
The platform was not designed around one industry or one assessment method. It was designed to provide a common model for manufacturers managing multiple products, versions and knowledge sources throughout the lifecycle.
The CRA reinforces a need that already existed: maintain product cybersecurity over time.
VAST was designed from the start around continuous product cybersecurity: understand the Asset, follow its versions, handle vulnerabilities, maintain Risk Assessments and keep evidence. The Cyber Resilience Act now makes this operating model even more important for manufacturers of products with digital elements.
Our goal is not to turn regulation into fear-based marketing. It is to give teams an environment where daily cybersecurity work naturally creates better traceability and a better ability to demonstrate what was done.
The product at the center. Human control over decisions. Evidence over time.
VAST uses automation to find, connect and reassess what can be automated. Important cybersecurity decisions remain explicit, justified and under human control. This makes it possible to use technology to save time without turning compliance or risk into a black box.